alexist: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] alexist at 07:20am on 28/04/2007 under ,
Now, confession: I like some of Baby Einstein's products. Before I actually had a baby I didn't really like the whole idea; it seemed to smack of competitive parenting. Then I discovered that some of their toys really are very good. I'm still not keen on the whole DVDs for kids part, though, and the following quote from their web page is just... well...

"That being said, The Baby Einstein Company is aware of the ongoing discussions regarding children and television viewing, particularly as it pertains to infants under the age of two years old. And, while we respect the American Academy of Pediatrics, we do not believe that their recommendation of no television for children under the age of two reflects the reality of today’s parents, families and households – for example, a recent Kaiser Family Foundation study found that 68% of all babies under two years old watch screen media on any given day. The Baby Einstein Company believes that when used properly, developmentally-appropriate video content can be a useful tool for parents and little ones to enjoy together."

(from http://www.babyeinstein.com/about/01-01_aboutus.asp)

So, parents ignore the AAP, so we'll help them! Not that I expected anything else--they want to sell their products. Still, it's a lovely piece of self-justification.

BTW, if you go to "products by age" and click on "birth and up", one of the items is the Baby Einstein Ultimate DVD collection ($369.99). For goodness' sakes, babies can't even see far enough to watch TV till they're a few months old. Not that I would let Aliza watch TV yet either. She's seen it of course, as I'm not enough of an extremist not to watch it when she's in the room, but she's never been sat in front of it. And she won't be for a long time yet. My mother was really strict about TV with me and I think it was good. You can really notice the difference with my youngest sister who was allowed to watch a lot more, and became much more of a TV junkie.
There are 5 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] pipsytip.livejournal.com at 10:00pm on 28/04/2007
My friend has baby enstein DVDs and they are fantastic. They keep me happily amused for a full 20minutes no bother. And I am way outside the demographic.

Seriously the DVDs are magical things. There are puppets and lovely classical music simplified but tuneful. There are simple shapes and spinny things all good and fab.

But wait until your youngun is a bit older first.

 
posted by [identity profile] batya-d.livejournal.com at 07:09pm on 30/04/2007
I just had a class on this Baby Einstein business in my class on childrens' musical development.

The whole Baby Einstein thing is really silly, if you're hoping it'll make your baby smarter somehow. Is it better than plopping the kid in front of the TV with just anything on? Sure, but Sesame Street provides the same type of stimulation for the child (and down time for tired parents), and with more educational research behind it.

I could go on and on, but I'll just say that the musical value of the DVD is laughable-- the pieces are played on synthesizer with a high-pitched, tinkly sound effect that supposedly appeals more to babies. Fair enough, I've studied maternal-infant speech patterns and it is true that babies respond to higher-pitched vocalizations. But you know what? You want your kid to love classical music? You want your kid to be smart? Play a real classical recording, or if it must be a DVD, find one that doesn't bastardize some of the greatest Western Art Music, preying on well-intentioned parents to make big business.

 
posted by [identity profile] arosoff.livejournal.com at 07:13pm on 30/04/2007
Aliza loves Bach's Goldberg Variations :) (Glenn Gould version)

Sesame Street is intended for slightly older kids, too... The BBC does fantastic kids' TV but I wouldn't let Aliza watch it yet.
 
posted by [identity profile] batya-d.livejournal.com at 02:12pm on 01/05/2007
True, Sesame Street is too much for a 4 month-old, best to avoid TV for the baby altogether until a bit later, I would think. Maybe some infant videos or whatever when the parent needs the baby to be occupied so they can rest a little :)
 
posted by [identity profile] clarisinda.livejournal.com at 08:13pm on 29/04/2007
Totally agree with you there. What I really hate is when parents use the telly as a free baby sitter, and households (with or without children) who have the telly on as background noise/pictures. Arg. I honestly think that watching less TV improves your quality of life, and while I can't see any harm in children watching the odd suitable program, what benefit can there be from watching hours upon hours of one way communication? Even with the grown ups I know the amount of time they spend in front of the TV/DVD player seems excessive to me.

June

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2 3 4 5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9 10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16 17
 
18
 
19 20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30