posted by
alexist at 04:20pm on 14/04/2003
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
... if they'd just said "Nah, you're pretty normal". But most average?? I think not. It's not that I consider myself to be some kind of Andy Warhol level weirdo, or incredible individualist, but I do think I deviate from the norm to some degree.
Certainly, when I was in high school I was a complete weirdo. In my high school, you had two choices: Belong to a clique, or not exist. I valued independent thought, so I chose the latter option. Most of the kids who "rebelled" simply chose to conform to a different standard. I didn't think that hanging out behind the school and smoking pot was a particularly cool or intelligent thing to do. At the same time I had no desire to be in student government. I worked just hard enough to get good grades, purely out of ego--I knew I was smart enough. I didn't particularly give a shit about academic competition, though. If I was interested, I paid attention and learned something. If I wasn't, I went to sleep. Literally. I snoozed my way through physics. Given the quality of teaching in that class, though, I may not have been any worse off. :-) I simply learned enough from the textbook to pass the exams. The Physics Regents was the last high school exam I ever took. I knew I could fail it and still graduate--I'd probably still pass the course, for that matter. I still managed 82% (pass = 65%).
Certainly, by the standards of that time and place, I was beyond not-normal, I was in Freak Land. I had no interest in gossiping on the phone, hanging out at the mall, giggling at boys, going to parties, etc.
As you get older, people's horizons expand a bit, and I think I'm a little closer to normal than I used to be. Still, I'd dispute the "most average" part. If I were truly average, I'd be listening to chart music, know what was in style, and voluntarily watched multiple episodes of a reality series. Instead, I'm watching things with men in drag. And I'm a straight woman!
Certainly, when I was in high school I was a complete weirdo. In my high school, you had two choices: Belong to a clique, or not exist. I valued independent thought, so I chose the latter option. Most of the kids who "rebelled" simply chose to conform to a different standard. I didn't think that hanging out behind the school and smoking pot was a particularly cool or intelligent thing to do. At the same time I had no desire to be in student government. I worked just hard enough to get good grades, purely out of ego--I knew I was smart enough. I didn't particularly give a shit about academic competition, though. If I was interested, I paid attention and learned something. If I wasn't, I went to sleep. Literally. I snoozed my way through physics. Given the quality of teaching in that class, though, I may not have been any worse off. :-) I simply learned enough from the textbook to pass the exams. The Physics Regents was the last high school exam I ever took. I knew I could fail it and still graduate--I'd probably still pass the course, for that matter. I still managed 82% (pass = 65%).
Certainly, by the standards of that time and place, I was beyond not-normal, I was in Freak Land. I had no interest in gossiping on the phone, hanging out at the mall, giggling at boys, going to parties, etc.
As you get older, people's horizons expand a bit, and I think I'm a little closer to normal than I used to be. Still, I'd dispute the "most average" part. If I were truly average, I'd be listening to chart music, know what was in style, and voluntarily watched multiple episodes of a reality series. Instead, I'm watching things with men in drag. And I'm a straight woman!
(no subject)
And what makes you define that as normality/average?
I'd define myself as fairly close to the norm/average, and don't meet any of those criteria.
The whole debate is a joke, there can be no answer, no resolution, no changing of people's perspectives, nothing gained from an argument over personal viewpoints which (let's face it) are very deeply held and personal.
Unless I'm missing the point - which I do fairly frequently when it comes to some things on mono.
(no subject)
Statistically, the average person _does_ do these things. But not doing them doesn't immediately render you abnormal. :)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Perhaps I should mend fences here. My view of you is someone who gives the norm a good name, and shows why we have one, not someone who deviates from it. I'd agree that makes you in some sense more worthwhile a person than someone who follows the norm out of habit, but this doesn't make you "different" in the sense I'm thinking of.