alexist: (jewish)
posted by [personal profile] alexist at 02:40pm on 14/09/2006 under ,
I went to the Judaica store today to buy a new mezuzah.

The guy in front of me was buying 25 mezuzot! At first I thought he was buying them for a school or some other institutional building, but no, it was for his house (he called his wife to consult about them). Not just cases, he was buying scrolls, which are the expensive part (about £30 each, depending on how big it is--but unlike the cases, you can't buy a cheap scroll).

You need one for each doorway in your house (not including bathrooms or closets). I calculated that my parents' old 4 bedroom house would need 12. I can't imagine a house large enough to need 25 of them!

After that, I felt silly needing only one!
alexist: (jewish)
posted by [personal profile] alexist at 04:47pm on 14/09/2006 under ,
a honey dish for Rosh Hashana. It's a little glass bowl with a metal top; the handle for the lid is an apple cut out from the main piece, with 3 little red beads that look like pomegranate seeds. Inexpensive but cute. We don't get such a good choice of Judaica here (much as I would have liked a really nice mezuzah for our front door I had to be content with plain wood) so one must Make Do. Not that I could afford the nice sterling silver anyway, or justify it for something like a honey dish that's used once a year. I'd be more likely to buy really nice candlesticks or a kiddush cup first, as they get used every week. (I do have a lovely sterling-silver bread knife I was given as a gift.) Properly speaking my mother still owes me a pair of candlesticks anyway. ;) (My family is really very secular, but we do all own candlesticks, and my mother even said she should have bought me some before I was married. I'll hold her to it one of these days.)

Also, I was in the butcher's and was just getting my bag ready to go, when he said "wait" and gave me a little jar of honey and wished me Shana-Tova. That was sweet (pardon the pun) and I was smiling as I walked out.
alexist: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] alexist at 05:45pm on 14/09/2006 under , ,
There was an interview with the new chief executive of the NHS. One of the things he mentioned was the "need" to close maternity units. Apparently, he thinks that women are best served in larger units with full-time consultant staff.

From where I sit, this is the NHS contradicting itself. Before I got pregnant, I kept hearing about choice, about flexibility, about reducing intervention in birth. Now they come out with plans that do a U-turn on all of that. (I take the stats on intervention with a grain of salt, of course, since the patient populations aren't equal, but apparently consultant-led units have a higher intervention rate even when you allow for different levels of risk.)

Then, of course, I discovered that it was all rhetoric anyway. If you're a patient like me, and I'm not even exceptionally risky, you don't have a choice. Those nice "birthing centres" keep their stats healthy by carefully screening their patients. Legally, I have a right to a home birth: a trust cannot deny them, although they can make it difficult. (Why I have a legal right to a home birth, but not to a midwife-led one, escapes me.) But I'm very sure that if I asked, they'd do everything they could to discourage me.

And then, of course, I experienced the fun of being a maternity patient at Barnet Hospital, which has certainly not endeared me to NHS maternity care. Closing more maternity units will undoubtedly mean more women experiencing the substandard care I've received. If the NHS has any intention of closing or "consolidating" units, they better be damn sure that it won't result in a decline in care--something about which I am very, very sceptical, given the debts of many trusts.

This came on the heels of the following article by Annalisa Barbieri:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1869306,00.html

Now, it's true that she was given FUD about the risks of VBAC: if you have a new-style low incision, VBAC is perfectly safe (assuming that the problems that led to the initial Caesarean don't recur) provided that you are not induced. The risk of complication jumps by several times if you're induced. Otherwise fine. However, she then goes into her own FUD tactics regarding the risks of a Caesarean birth. While some Caesareans are needlessly performed, many are necessary and presenting them in this light is no better than women being "browbeaten" into C-sections. And while I am firmly in favour of women making informed choices, I also know that there are limits to a layperson's knowledge. If my blood pressure stays high, I run a risk of induction and/or C-section. If I am told by a consultant that I should deliver via C-section, I will ask why, ask about the risks, and if I am satisfied with the answers--I'll agree. Accepting a doctor's advice without question may be foolish, but rejecting it when it's well thought out is at least as silly.
alexist: (pregnant)
posted by [personal profile] alexist at 06:11pm on 14/09/2006 under
Pelvic girdle pain.

(thought it might be sciatica, but apparently, this is more likely... whatever, it's annoying.)

June

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2 3 4 5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9 10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16 17
 
18
 
19 20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30