FFS!
Yesterday I got my NatWest statement. It indicated that on the 29th of the month, they would be deducting £28 for an unauthorized borrowing charge.
Now, you may remember that this was all because of a bounced direct debit.
This £28 is because NatWest's deduction of a charge put me into overdraft. I called, they refunded the fee, and said that if I was hit with another fee because of this, it would be reversed as well. Simple, right?
So I thought, and when I got the letter I reckoned it was their automated system, and rang them up.
The bitch:
1) Said that the fee refund was merely a "goodwill gesture" and not an acknowledgement of any wrongdoing by the bank;
2) Said that they cannot refund any further fees;
3) Completely ignored supposed note on my account calling for refund of further charge.
Further, she claimed that Sky Digital was solely responsible for taking it out early. My understanding of the Direct Debit guarantee is that the bank is responsible if a direct debit is allowed to go out before its due date (our agreement with Sky specifies "on or after the 7th of each month".) Further, she actually tried to use the "it's a weekend" excuse. Which, by the way, doesn't work because the 5th (when the direct debit was taken) was a Thursday.
Even if I got Sky to admit wrongdoing on the direct debit, this is all due to NatWest's fees. THEIR fee put me into overdraft, hence triggering an unauthorized borrowing fee, which has now triggered ANOTHER one!! Surely, if the original fee was reversed, then I was no longer borrowing money, hence I can't be charged for it!
I gave up and hung up. She was too goddamn rude. I'll try again tomorrow and if that doesn't work I'm writing to the Guardian. It's no longer about £28, it's about being fucked over repeatedly.
Yesterday I got my NatWest statement. It indicated that on the 29th of the month, they would be deducting £28 for an unauthorized borrowing charge.
Now, you may remember that this was all because of a bounced direct debit.
This £28 is because NatWest's deduction of a charge put me into overdraft. I called, they refunded the fee, and said that if I was hit with another fee because of this, it would be reversed as well. Simple, right?
So I thought, and when I got the letter I reckoned it was their automated system, and rang them up.
The bitch:
1) Said that the fee refund was merely a "goodwill gesture" and not an acknowledgement of any wrongdoing by the bank;
2) Said that they cannot refund any further fees;
3) Completely ignored supposed note on my account calling for refund of further charge.
Further, she claimed that Sky Digital was solely responsible for taking it out early. My understanding of the Direct Debit guarantee is that the bank is responsible if a direct debit is allowed to go out before its due date (our agreement with Sky specifies "on or after the 7th of each month".) Further, she actually tried to use the "it's a weekend" excuse. Which, by the way, doesn't work because the 5th (when the direct debit was taken) was a Thursday.
Even if I got Sky to admit wrongdoing on the direct debit, this is all due to NatWest's fees. THEIR fee put me into overdraft, hence triggering an unauthorized borrowing fee, which has now triggered ANOTHER one!! Surely, if the original fee was reversed, then I was no longer borrowing money, hence I can't be charged for it!
I gave up and hung up. She was too goddamn rude. I'll try again tomorrow and if that doesn't work I'm writing to the Guardian. It's no longer about £28, it's about being fucked over repeatedly.
There are 13 comments on this entry. (Reply.)