posted by
alexist at 04:00am on 11/10/2004
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I find it annoying when I read ads blaming globalization for allowing European produce to be sold cheaply in the Third World.
They'd be better off campaigning against agricultural subsidy programs that allow European produce to be dumped cheaply. The CAP is as dangerous to Third World farmers as the WTO. And it hurts European taxpayers, who pay for it twice: once in gigantic subsidies (most of which go to farmers who don't need it) and again in higher prices. Why should Europeans pay more for subsidized beet sugar when tropical countries can grow cane more cheaply? (And worse, why should the subsidized sugar then be dumped on the Caribbean?) The linkage between production and payment has only been broken in Britain--other EU countries aren't set to do it for years.
Globalization can help poor countries, but not if it's an excuse to create a dumping ground for Europe's unwanted crops.
They'd be better off campaigning against agricultural subsidy programs that allow European produce to be dumped cheaply. The CAP is as dangerous to Third World farmers as the WTO. And it hurts European taxpayers, who pay for it twice: once in gigantic subsidies (most of which go to farmers who don't need it) and again in higher prices. Why should Europeans pay more for subsidized beet sugar when tropical countries can grow cane more cheaply? (And worse, why should the subsidized sugar then be dumped on the Caribbean?) The linkage between production and payment has only been broken in Britain--other EU countries aren't set to do it for years.
Globalization can help poor countries, but not if it's an excuse to create a dumping ground for Europe's unwanted crops.
There are no comments on this entry. (Reply.)