I keep feeling I should give more of a shit about the war on Iraq. The problem is that I think the division of assholes on this one is about even. Bush wanted war and Chirac handed him the opportunity on a silver platter. Many of the protesters are completely naive at best. Really, how do you deal with a war that's being fought for the wrong reasons, but may be good in the end? The pacifist left doesn't have an answer for that. It's never had an answer for things that don't come within the nice orderly world it's laid out, where people act logically. Irrationality, much less evil like the 9/11 bombers, doesn't fit into this.
The anti-war group still has no real answer, and the Iraqis saying "thank you for liberating us" don't make their case much better. (I read that in the Guardian, by the way, not a US paper.) They can't even get it through their heads that it isn't just a huge plot to get Iraqi oil.
I believe that people do have the ability to change things. Fatalism doesn't work for me. But I'm no starry-eyed student activist. What good will marching in the streets do? None. All it does is get hijacked by the people with the loudest mouths. (Side note: I've discovered that the British Stop the War coalition is trying to keep "on message"--it's the USA ANSWER group that's got a viciously anti-Israel agenda.) I did some work with NYPIRG in college, so I know something of how you actually get things done. All marches do is draw public attention to your cause. If you want to get the government to do something about it, you can scream in the street all you like and it won't make a damn bit of difference. You need to get to people who matter, and you have to be coherent, prepared, and able to show that it'll make a difference at the next election. Sure, people are angry now. But politicians are betting that by the time the next general election rolls around, this will all be a distant memory.
In the meantime, can we stop running the damn footage 24/7?
The anti-war group still has no real answer, and the Iraqis saying "thank you for liberating us" don't make their case much better. (I read that in the Guardian, by the way, not a US paper.) They can't even get it through their heads that it isn't just a huge plot to get Iraqi oil.
I believe that people do have the ability to change things. Fatalism doesn't work for me. But I'm no starry-eyed student activist. What good will marching in the streets do? None. All it does is get hijacked by the people with the loudest mouths. (Side note: I've discovered that the British Stop the War coalition is trying to keep "on message"--it's the USA ANSWER group that's got a viciously anti-Israel agenda.) I did some work with NYPIRG in college, so I know something of how you actually get things done. All marches do is draw public attention to your cause. If you want to get the government to do something about it, you can scream in the street all you like and it won't make a damn bit of difference. You need to get to people who matter, and you have to be coherent, prepared, and able to show that it'll make a difference at the next election. Sure, people are angry now. But politicians are betting that by the time the next general election rolls around, this will all be a distant memory.
In the meantime, can we stop running the damn footage 24/7?
There are no comments on this entry. (Reply.)